Excellent post, thank you Gillian. Perhaps the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ needs to be replaced by ‘conspiracy investigator’. We have seen over the last four years how governments, the media and other interests went into overdrive conspiring to keep the truth hidden from public view because it did not fit the narrative. It is great that through your investigations you are shedding needed light on such attempts to deceive the public.
Thanks Howard, Steve Baker MP was very concerned about the quality of the science to which MPs had access - if he is still an MP after the election, I may sent it to him!
In this inverted world you, a 'tinfoil-hat-wearing far right anti-semitic conspiracy theorist' (as Mordaunt would brand you for reasons only she really understands - or perhaps she doesn't) are speaking logic, integrity and truth. Great post, thank you.
There is nothing special about 5G the frequency bands are a bit higher than 4G but power levels are the same a TV transmitter 50 km from you is the same power as a 5G mast 500 meters from you. Both of these sources are less powerful than your laptops wifi connection the level of which at 1 meter range is upto 100 times higher. We are bathed in RF energy from TV radio cell mobile wifi radar (powers thousands of times higher than communication sources) and other sources. There is nothing special about 5G. Every time a new communication bands comes into uses we get the same old conspiracy theories.
The frequencies may matter less than other aspects. This review states, "most of the laboratory experiments conducted to date are not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of the real-life operating environment in which wireless radiation systems operate. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal."(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842742030028X). However 5G case studies in a real life environment have been carried out by Prof Lennart Hardell, showing quickly developing severe symptoms: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/26/are-we-taking-the-risks-of-5g-seriously-enough/
Each combination of carrier frequency and intensity, and information stream and its amplitude, poses a different challenge to a given biological system.
I doubt you can argue against that.
As a consequence, a safety study for one such combination is potentially of little reassurance as regards some other combination.
It used to be that the Radio 4 198 kHz longwave transmission was of elevated nuisance between 19:03 and 19:15, but nowadays the programming has been "levelled up".
Excellent post, thank you Gillian. Perhaps the term ‘conspiracy theorist’ needs to be replaced by ‘conspiracy investigator’. We have seen over the last four years how governments, the media and other interests went into overdrive conspiring to keep the truth hidden from public view because it did not fit the narrative. It is great that through your investigations you are shedding needed light on such attempts to deceive the public.
Thanks Howard, Steve Baker MP was very concerned about the quality of the science to which MPs had access - if he is still an MP after the election, I may sent it to him!
In this inverted world you, a 'tinfoil-hat-wearing far right anti-semitic conspiracy theorist' (as Mordaunt would brand you for reasons only she really understands - or perhaps she doesn't) are speaking logic, integrity and truth. Great post, thank you.
Why are you so surprised? Bill Gates wrote the forward to Penny Mordaunt's book............
There is nothing special about 5G the frequency bands are a bit higher than 4G but power levels are the same a TV transmitter 50 km from you is the same power as a 5G mast 500 meters from you. Both of these sources are less powerful than your laptops wifi connection the level of which at 1 meter range is upto 100 times higher. We are bathed in RF energy from TV radio cell mobile wifi radar (powers thousands of times higher than communication sources) and other sources. There is nothing special about 5G. Every time a new communication bands comes into uses we get the same old conspiracy theories.
Thank you for you comment. What is most important is whether RFR affects human cells and thousands of studies show that it does: https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/
The frequencies may matter less than other aspects. This review states, "most of the laboratory experiments conducted to date are not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of the real-life operating environment in which wireless radiation systems operate. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal."(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037842742030028X). However 5G case studies in a real life environment have been carried out by Prof Lennart Hardell, showing quickly developing severe symptoms: https://dailysceptic.org/2024/02/26/are-we-taking-the-risks-of-5g-seriously-enough/
Each combination of carrier frequency and intensity, and information stream and its amplitude, poses a different challenge to a given biological system.
I doubt you can argue against that.
As a consequence, a safety study for one such combination is potentially of little reassurance as regards some other combination.
It used to be that the Radio 4 198 kHz longwave transmission was of elevated nuisance between 19:03 and 19:15, but nowadays the programming has been "levelled up".