Thanks, Gillian, this is a very helpful review and collection of the evidence from both sides.
As to why the BBC is not able to present a balanced position, I think we can never expect a state funded broadcaster to do this. Publications like the Guardian are also bought media.
I recently watched this film about 5G. It is aimed at a general audience. Perhaps is too much of a difficult scientific topic to expect to be able to get a balanced message across in a production like this. I would be interested in your thoughts.
Thanks, Gillian, this is a very helpful review and collection of the evidence from both sides.
As to why the BBC is not able to present a balanced position, I think we can never expect a state funded broadcaster to do this. Publications like the Guardian are also bought media.
This recent article is very damning of the BBC. They are really no more than a mouthpiece of the government and act to censor 'non approved' viewpoints via their 'Trusted News' and 'misinformation detection' activities. https://open.substack.com/pub/sayerji/p/laundering-censorship-the-bbc-usaid
I recently watched this film about 5G. It is aimed at a general audience. Perhaps is too much of a difficult scientific topic to expect to be able to get a balanced message across in a production like this. I would be interested in your thoughts.
https://odysee.com/@PrinceActarus74:a/5G-Apocalypse-documentaire-de-Sacha-Stone-%281%29:a
You are spot on!
That WH0 review was so biased it is fraud. Scientific fraud should be considered the same as criminal fraud.
And the people responsible should be taken to court for crimes against humanity and our planet.